https://sahumanities.org/index.php/sah <p><em>Southern African Humanities</em> publishes original research with a material-culture focus in Archaeology, Anthropology, History and related fields.</p> KwaZulu-Natal Museum en-US Southern African Humanities 1681-5564 https://sahumanities.org/index.php/sah/article/view/553 <p>Different evaluations of the evidence underlie contrasting interpretations of southern African rock art. Researchers often come from a range of disciplines and tend to think in terms of their own discipline. Departing from the anthropologically informed approach to southern African rock art, several palaeontologists propose that some southern African groups resemble Western palaeontologists in that they may have recognized fossils as traces of extinct animals, which they might have explained in ‘geomyths’ and reconstructed in rock art. An appraisal of two related cases is presented. In each case, an evaluation of the evidence finds that it does not support the argument. Geomythology is found to lack a convincing theory of how fossils become culturally meaningful within a given worldview. The insufficiency of the supporting myth and rock art evidence, and geomythology’s poor theoretical capacity to interpret socio-cultural human behaviours from myths and rock art, are grounds to reject the validity of the conclusions in both cases. Sufficient evidence and improvements to theory and method are needed before geomythology can contribute to southern African rock art studies.</p> David Witelson Copyright (c) 2026 Southern African Humanities 2026-07-24 2026-07-24 39 1–38 1–38 https://sahumanities.org/index.php/sah/article/view/549 <p>Dogs have long been part of southern African Iron Age farming communities. This paper reviews the archaeological evidence for widely cited claims of their presence in the 1st millennium AD at two sites, Bosutswe in eastern Botswana and Diamant in the Limpopo province of South Africa. Detailed analysis of the original excavation records and information regarding the radiocarbon dates obtained at these sites, as well as the ceramic associations of the skeletal remains in question, show that these claims cannot be confirmed. At Bosutswe, instead of appearing c. AD 700, there is no credible evidence for the presence of domestic dogs before the Late Toutswe phase of the site’s occupation in the 12th century AD. At Diamant, where a date of c. AD 570 has frequently been cited, available data do not permit the dog remains found there to be closely linked to any of the site’s radiocarbon dates, although a late-1st-millennium AD age is probable. With Bosutswe, Diamant and a second Botswanan site—Taukome—removed from the equation, the oldest credible evidence for domestic dogs in southern Africa currently comes from the Thukela Basin of KwaZulu-Natal, beginning in the 7th/8th centuries AD. Recommendations for careful assessment of these and similar claims are made.</p> Edwin N. Wilmsen Peter Mitchell Copyright (c) 2026 Southern African Humanities 2026-08-07 2026-08-07 39 77–95 77–95